Style has seldom partaken in a generally excellent standing. Regardless of its certain accomplishment as a social and business peculiarity, it stays the very exemplum of triviality, silliness and vanity. The talk on design accepts the philosophical type of an evaluate of simple appearances, the social hypothetical type of a study of the market-economy, or the customary type of a scrutinize of sexual ethical quality; yet there is by all accounts no chance of a genuine worry with the subject that would continue in any case than in the method of investigate.
Sparkling and blinding, style distracts from the substance of things. It is the actual embodiment of the individual estranged in the surge of utilization, of oneself lost in the splendid universe of items. Nonsensical, eccentric, flighty, capricious, style makes its entry each season again, with all the force of enticement of a touchy sovereign, sure of winning.
Finishing up comment
The manifestation of all vanity on the planet, it conveys with it the scent di femmina, of which Don Giovanni sings. The savants and the sociologists take it up simply to revile it or, best case scenario, mull over it with a wry and separated amusement.The talk on design is built by the relationship of three significant calculated verbalizations: the division of being and simple appearance; the division of the genders; and – indistinguishably connected to the last option – the division of the classes.